Saturday, March 11, 2006

Knight (me) vs Knight (generalkaia) Challenge 2-0

Again, it wasn't much of a game (kaia forfeited on time once more), so i will only show you the litlle notation and a diagram of the final position (just as i did with my previous game against kaia).

[Event "m1136856424"]
[Site "net-chess.com"]
[Date "2006.01.10"]
[Round "1"]
[White "cthigpen"]
[Black "dutchdefence"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B00"]
[WhiteElo "1500"]
[BlackElo "1500"]
[EventType "game (corr)"]

1. e4 b6 2. d4 Bb7 3. Nc3 e6 4. Nf3 Bb4 5. Bd3 Nf6 Reaching the following position after white (kaia) forfeits on time.


0-1

5 Comments:

At 14 March, 2006 15:18 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Edwin - thanks for visiting my blog and adding it to your sidebar. (It looks like there's not a click-able link, though.) Your blog looks interesting, and I've added a link to it from mine. - Steve ("Steve Learns Chess")

 
At 14 March, 2006 20:48 , Blogger Edwin 'dutchdefence' Meyer said...

I will correct that asap :-)

 
At 16 March, 2006 17:29 , Blogger Edwin 'dutchdefence' Meyer said...

I believe we played with a 30 days per move time out limit with an increment of 3 days with each move :-)

But usually play proceeds faster then that. It's not like i (or my opponent for that matter) wait 30 days to make a move... It's more of a safety net. Like when you cannot move for a couple of days :-)

But there are only a few servers that provide that time limit.

 
At 16 March, 2006 20:26 , Blogger Zek said...

wow, 30 days to move and you lose on time. Not very thrilling when you can't make it out of the opening.

 
At 16 March, 2006 22:42 , Blogger Edwin 'dutchdefence' Meyer said...

Not really, no...

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home